|
The failure of these guns was a serious problem for the British, as they were used on six battleships. As a result, the British made two significant changes. First, older ships had their mountings modified so as to increase their maximum elevations so as to achieve longer ranges with the same muzzle velocity. Second, larger calibers were rushed into production for new ship construction, as their heavier projectiles would travel a longer distance for the same muzzle velocity. The Marks XI, XI* and XII were interchangeable and had similar ballistic performance. The Mark XI was a Vickers design and resembled the Mark X except that the screwed collar was replaced by a breech ring screwed to the rear jacket. Mark XI* had a short B hoop overlapped by the jacket and the C hoop shrunk over the B tube and screwed onto the jacket. To counterbalance this, a D hoop was added over the jacket in front of the breech ring. As a result of these modifications, the XI* weighed a ton more than the Mark XI. Mark XII weighed the same as the Mark XI and differed from it by having more wire along the chase. The Mark XI gun breech mechanism was powered by a 3-cylinder hydraulic motor in place of the customary piston-rack assembly. A total of 85 guns of all types were made. |
HMS Vanguard
|
Stern Turret on HMS Vanguard
|
| Designation | 12"/50 (30.5 cm) Marks XI, XI* and XII |
| Ship Class Used On | St. Vincent, Neptune and Colossus Classes |
| Date Of Design | 1906 |
| Date In Service | 1910 |
| Gun Weight | Mark XI without Breech: 147,056
lbs. (66,703 kg)
Mark XI and XII with Breech: 149,408 lbs. (67,770 kg) Mark XI* with Breech: 151,648 lbs. (68,786 kg) |
| Gun Length oa | 617.7 in (15.690 m) |
| Bore Length | 600 in (15.240 m) |
| Rifling Length | N/A |
| Grooves | N/A |
| Lands | N/A |
| Twist | N/A |
| Chamber Volume | 23,031 in3 (377 dm3) |
| Rate Of Fire
(see Note) |
about 1.5 rounds per minute |
| Notes:
1) The Rate of Fire figure given above is found in references for British guns of this caliber, but "Warrior to Dreadnought: Warship Development 1860-1905" quotes Jellicoe's 1906 figures for rates of fire for these guns in gunlayers' tests and in battle practice and notes that the latter figures corresponded well to those actually attained by the Japanese at Tsushima: Gunlayers Test: 2 rounds per minute
2) Danger space for this gun against a
30 foot (9 m) target was estimated as follows:
|
|
| Type | Bag |
| Projectile Types and Weights | APC Mark VI (2crh) - 850 lbs. (386 kg)
APC Mark VIa (4crh) - 859.4 lbs. (389.8 kg) APC Mark VIIa (Greenboy) - 854 lbs. (387.4 kg) CPC Mark VIIa - 850 lbs. (386 kg) HE Mark IIa - 850 lbs. (386 kg) |
| Bursting Charge | APC Mark VI - 26.3 lbs. (11.9 kg)
APC Mark VIa - 27.3 lbs. (12.4 kg) APC Mark VIIa - 20.3 lbs. (9.2 kg) CPC Mark VIIa - 80 lbs. (36.3 kg) HE Mark IIa - 106.5 lbs. (48.3 kg) |
| Projectile Length | APC Mark VI - 39.7 in (100.8 cm)
APC Mark VIa - N/A APC Mark VIIa - 38.0 in (96.5 cm) CPC Mark VIIa - 48.4 in (122.9 cm) HE Mark IIa - 48.3 in (122.7 cm) |
| Propellant Charge | 307 lbs. (139.3 kg) MD45 |
| Muzzle Velocity | 2,852 fps (869 mps) |
| Working Pressure | N/A |
| Approximate Barrel Life | 75 - 80 rounds |
| Ammunition stowage per gun | N/A (probably about 80 rounds) |
| Notes:
1) Projectile weights from ADM 186/169. The sources below disagree as to muzzle velocity, propellant charge weights and maximum ranges. I have chosen to use those values given in "Jutland: An Analysis of the Fighting." 2) I do not have the dates as to when these ships were changed over to 4crh projectiles. "Greenboys" were issued starting in 1918. 3) AP Cap weights were 34.75 lbs. (15.7 kg) for the Mark VIa and 99 lbs. (44.9 kg) for the Mark VIIa. 4) In a Memorandum to the Controller dated 24 October 1910, it was stated that 12 inch (30.5 cm) APC shells striking at any angle over 20 degrees were unlikely to penetrated even 4 inches (10.2 cm) of KC armor (face hardened) and were likely to breakup at angles of 30 degrees when striking 6 inches (15.2 cm) of KC armor. Thus, it can be seen that the poor performance of British shells at Jutland (Skagerrak) cannot have been a surprise to the Royal Navy. Surprisingly, the memo does not suggest that the shells be improved, but instead urges that these thicknesses of armor be considered for future ship designs, as if it was to be expected that enemy shells would perform as poorly as did their own. |
|
| Elevation |
|
|
|
| 2.0 degrees |
|
|
|
| 3.5 degrees |
|
|
|
| 4.7 degrees |
|
|
|
| 6.1 degrees |
|
|
|
| 8.4 degrees |
|
|
|
| 10.7 degrees |
|
|
|
| 13.2 degrees |
|
|
|
| 15.0 degrees |
|
|
|
| Range |
|
|
| 0 yards (0 m) |
|
|
| 10,000 yards (9,144 m) |
|
|
| Note: Data from "British Battleships of World War Two" and represent an uncapped AP shell striking a plate at 90 degrees, i.e., with the axis of the shell perpendicular to the face of the plate. A capped shell would give about 10 to 20% improvement at low velocities and about 30 to 50% at high velocities. | ||
| Designation | Two-gun turrets
St. Vincent (5), Neptune (5) and Colossus (5): BXI |
| Weight | 510 - 540 tons (518 - 549 mt) |
| Elevation | -3 / +15 degrees |
| Rate of Elevation | N/A |
| Train | Forward and Aft Turrets: about -150
/ +150 degrees
Beam Turrets: about +30 / +150 degrees Q Turret: about +30 / +150 degrees on either side |
| Rate of Train | 4 degrees per second |
| Gun Recoil | N/A |
| Loading Angle | +5 degrees |
| Note: These were unique among British 12 in (30.5 cm) mountings in that they used a swash-plate training engine. | |