Like many contemporary mid-caliber designs, it was originally planned to use this gun in the AA role. However, again like many contemporary designs, the slow rates of train, elevation and firing made it ineffective in that role. For this reason, later designs dropped the high angle requirement, a decision which also reduced the mounting weights.
The early Southampton ("Town") class cruisers experienced dispersion problems with spreads up to 700 yards (640 m) being recorded. It was thought that air currents set up by the wing shells were affecting the flight of the center projectile even though the center gun was set back to reduce the problems. However, a Professor Hay, who was in charge of the gunnery trials of HMS Newcastle at Shoeburyness in October 1937, theorized that as the cordite charge was much smaller than the chamber, that its burning caused more pressure at the top of the chamber than at the bottom and sides and thus produced an uneven vibration along the gun barrel. Special high speed cameras were mounted in the turret and these showed that some shells were indeed canted at the muzzle which increased the dispersion. As a result, a timing circuit was introduced which delayed the firing of the center gun.
This gun consisted of an A tube, partial jacket, breech ring and breech bush screwed into the jacket and used a Welin breech-block with a hand-operated Asbury mechanism. If relined with a inner tapered A tube, the gun was then designated as Mark XXIII*. A total of 469 guns of all types were manufactured.
Consideration was given to using this gun as a heavy field gun, but none were ever used in that role.
There was a proposed variation tentatively designated as the Mark XXIV which was for the quadruple mounting originally intended for HMS Edinburgh and HMS Belfast. This gun would have used a power-worked breech mechanism, but it was cancelled along with the quadruple mounting.
The Mark XXIV designation was ultimately given to an Army coastal defense gun having the same performance as the Mark VII*, but constructed with a loose barrel. About 140 of these were built during World War II.
Bow turrets on HMS Belfast, now a museum
ship at London, UK
|Designation||6"/50 (15.2 cm) BL Mark XXIII|
|Ship Class Used On||Leander, Perth, Arethusa, Southampton
("Town"), Edinburgh ("Modified Town"), Fiji ("Colony"), Ceylon (Modified
"Colony") and Swiftsure classes
Planned for Tiger class
|Date Of Design||1930|
|Date In Service||1933|
|Gun Weight||6.906 tons (7.017 mt)|
|Gun Length oa||309.8 in (7.869 m)|
|Bore Length||309.7 in (7.620 m)|
|Rifling Length||255.4 in (6.486 m)|
|Grooves||(36) 0.045 in deep x 0.3759 (1.17 x 9.548 mm)|
|Lands||0.1477 in (3.752 mm)|
|Twist||Uniform RH 1 in 30|
|Chamber Volume||1,750 in3 (28.7 dm3)|
|Rate Of Fire
|6 - 8 rounds per minute|
|Note: "British Cruisers of World War Two" says that the rate of fire in action for the triple mountings was about five to six rounds per gun per minute. See additional information in the "Mount / Turret" notes below.|
|Projectile Types and Weights||CPBC - 112 lbs. (50.8 kg)
HE - 112 lbs. (50.8 kg)
|Bursting Charge||CPBC - 3.75 lbs. (1.7 kg)
HE - about 8 lbs. (3.6 kg)
|Propellant Charge||30 lbs. (13.6 kg) SC 150
32 lbs. (14.5 kg) NQFP 128 (semi-flashless)
|Muzzle Velocity||2,758 fps (841 mps)|
|Working Pressure||20.5 tons/in2 (3,230 kg/cm2)|
|Approximate Barrel Life||1,100 rounds|
|Ammunition stowage per gun||200 rounds (see Note 3)|
1) The propellant was in a single bag and flashless powder was introduced towards the end of the war.
2) Outfits consisted of CPBC with HE provided for shore bombardment. In addition to these, each gun was allotted 34 LA and 2.5 HA practice rounds.
3) For Treaty compliance purposes, the Town class cruisers were rated at a magazine capacity of 150 rounds per gun, but they actually had space for 200 rounds. All other classes, including the Modified Town class, were rated at 200 rounds. In 1948, HMS Belfast had an outfit of 1,384 CPC, 960 HE, 474 Practice and 44 Drill for a total of 2,862 projectiles.
4) Shells were 5/10crh.
|Note: Time of flight
for CPBC Shell with MV = 2,700 fps (823 mps)
5,000 yards (4,570 m): 6.6 seconds
10,000 yards (9,140 m): 15.9 seconds
15,000 yards (13,720 m): 29.4 seconds
20,000 yards (18,290 m): 47.2 seconds
24,500 yards (22,400 m): 71.4 seconds
|12,500 yards (11,430 m)||
|22,000 yards (20,120 m)||
|Note: Data from "Nelson to Vanguard: Warship Design and Development 1923-1945."|
(see Note 1)
Leander (4) and Arethusa (3): Mark XXI
(see Note 3)
|Mark XXI: 91 tons (92 mt)
Southampton Mark XXII: 146 tons (148 mt)
Gloucester Mark XXII: About 182 tons (185 mt)
Ceylon Mark XXIII: 161 tons (163 mt)
Edinburgh Mark XXIII: 182 tons (185 mt)
RP 10 Mark XXIV: 168 tons (169 mt)
|Elevation||Mark XXI: -5 / +60 degrees
Mark XXII: -5 / +45 degrees
Mark XXIII: -5 / +45 degrees
RP 10 Mark XXIV: -5 / +60 degrees
|Elevation Rate||All: 10 degrees per second|
|Train||+120 / -120 degrees|
(see Note 4)
|All: 5 to 7 degrees per second|
|Gun recoil||16.5 in (42 cm)|
|Loading Angle||Limits: -5 to +12.5 degrees
Preferred: +5 to +7 degrees
1) The Mark XXIII designation was apparently given to both the quadruple (four-gun) turrets originally planned for the Edinburgh class and to the triple (three-gun) turrets actually used on the Edinburgh and Fiji classes. See Note 5.
2) The Mark XXII and Mark XXIII Triple Mounts had the center gun set back 30 inches (76.2 cm) in order to reduce the interference between shells in flight, give the loading crews more "elbow room" and to better balance the revolving mass. Triple mounts had two right-handed guns and one left-handed gun.
3) The weight differences for the triple mounts is primarily due to armor thickness. For the Mark XXII, Southampton had 1 inch (2.54 cm) armor all around. Gloucester had 3.9 inch (10 cm) glacis plate armor with the rest 2 in (5.1 cm). For the Mark XXIII, Edinburgh had 3.9 inch (10 cm) glacis plate and the rest 2 in (5.1 cm). Fiji had 2 inch (5.1 cm) glacis plate and roof, the rest was 1 inch (2.54 cm).
4) Each mounting had two training engines. When both were used together, train rate was 5 degrees per second, but using just one engine sped the training up to 7 degrees per second.
5) The Edinburgh class were originally planned to carry four quadruple mountings. Tests at Shoeburyness in early 1936 with a mockup where all four guns were equally spaced at 42 inches (106.7 cm) apart showed considerable shell interference and collision problems, with the resultant large dispersal patterns. A later design had the guns mounted as two pairs, somewhat similar in concept to the French quad mounts. This design had each pair of guns only 27.5 inches (69.9 cm) apart and the innermost pair 46.5 inches (118.1 cm) apart. This design did not produce acceptable results and the quad mounting was cancelled in favor of an improved triple mounting. Delay coils were under consideration at the time of the cancellation.
6) Many cruisers had "X" turret removed as weight compensation for added electronic equipment. Its place was usually taken by additional AA guns. HMS Belfast, of the larger "Modified Town" class, was unique in keeping all four of her mountings throughout the war and beyond.
7) The gunlayers usually followed the pointer using hand control, changing to power elevation only for larger movements.
8) Guns were hand loaded and rammed.
9) The twin Mark XXI was a "short trunk" design powered by a 65 HP electric motor and hydraulic pump using light mineral oil, located on the revolving structure. The guns were individually sleeved and runout was via compressed air. Elevation was by a swashplate engine driving a worm gear. There were two training engines which were usually operated together as control was better, although training speed was faster when only one was used. Provisions were made to allow manual training. The fore and aft turret groups had a single magazine, with each turret having its own handling room, which was part of the fixed structure. Charges were passed by hand from the magazine through a revolving flashtight scuttle to the cordite handling room. From here, charges were delivered by a single endless chain hoist to each handling room at the rate of 16 per minute for A, B and X mountings. For Y mounting, the handling room was directly above the magazines and the hoist was replaced by two hand ups. Shells were delivered to the handling room by another endless chain hoist at the rate of 16 shells per minute. From the handling room, another endless chain for each gun carried the powder charge to the rear of the gun. Shells were delivered vertically to the gunhouse, where a tilting bucket transferred them to a fixed tray. From here they went to an intermediate tray and then to the loading tray which pivoted on an arm from the cradle. Shells were hand rammed and then charges were placed on the loading tray and hand loaded.
10) The triple Mark XXII was a short trunk design with similar features as the Mark XXI. The electric motor was increased to 103 HP. These ships had a magazine for each turret with a shell room on the same level. A handling room just below the turret was part of the fixed structure. Dual electric powered endless chains delivered 32 charges per minute from the magazine to the handling room. Charges were carried by hand to crewmen in "cordite pockets" attached to the revolving structure where they were passed by hand via hand-ups into the gunhouse. Shells were delivered by dual hoists to the handling room at the rate of 32 rounds per minute. Each gun had its own shell hoist attached to the revolving structure that delivered shells vertically to the gunhouse. Arrangements were similar to those for the twin mounts, with the exception that the center gun had a longer intermediate tray as it was further from the hoist than the other two guns.
11) The triple Mark XXIII was powered by a 114 HP motor and had a completely different ammunition supply systems as compared to the earlier Marks. These were "long trunk" designs with each turret having a magazine and a handling room with a shell room located one deck above. Charges were passed via scuttles from the magazines to a handling room where they were loaded onto endless chain hoists. There was one charge hoist per gun and these ran directly from the handling room up to the gunhouse, with the charges being delivered vertically. Each hoist could deliver 10 (Wingate) or 12 (Campbell) charges per minute. In the shell room, shells were passed to an electrically powered and independently-revolving shell ring that could hold up to 56 projectiles stowed inclined with noses upwards and outwards. From here they were passed by hand to the loading trays of the shell hoists. Each gun was provided with its own shell hoist which could supply 10 (Wingate) or 12 (Campbell) shells per minute and which delivered the shells vertically to the gunhouse (both Wingate and Cambell agree that the maximum rate of fire was 8 rounds per minute regardless of which is correct about the rate of ammunition supply). Arrangements for moving projectiles to the breeches were similar to those for the Mark XXII. There was also an auxiliary cordite supply to the rear and left of the center shell hoists and an auxiliary shell hoist on the right hand side to the rear of the right hand shell hoist. Cordite containers were disposed of by pushing them into chutes at the rear of the gunhouse. Each turret had a crew of 46 men as follows: Captain of Turret (CT), Local Sight Layer (LSL), Turret Trainer (TT), Sightsetter (SS), Telephone Operator (TO), Three Gun Crews (7 men each), Shell Room Crew (9 men), Cordite Handling Room Crew (3 men) and Magazine Crew (8 men). In addition, each pair of turrets was allotted one Ordnance Artificer (OA) and two Electrical Mechanicians (EM).
12) Gun axes were 84 in (213 cm) apart on the Mark XXI mounting and 78 in (198 cm) apart on the Mark XXII and Mark XXIII mountings.
13) As these guns were hand-rammed, firing at high elevations meant that the guns needed considerable time to depress to the loading elevation and then elevate back up into firing position.
14) The Mark XXIV was a war-time development based upon the Mark XXII. This was to have achieved a dual-purpose capability by increasing the maximum elevation to +60 degrees and possibly using a new, fully-automatic 6 inch (15.2 cm) gun. However, the barbette and roller path diameters were no larger than the previous triple mountings, which would have entailed a rather cramped design. This project was superseded by the Mark XXV which was in turned cancelled by the end of the war.
26 November 2008 - Benchmark
30 January 2009 - Added information about both Mark XXIV guns
19 December 2009 - Added information about dispersion problems and Belfast ammunition outfit in 1948
24 September 2011 - Added information about practice rounds, training motors, the Mark XXIII mounting and Loading Procedure
20 April 2012 - Added information about ammunition supply and rate of fire for Mark XXIII mountings